Home Proxy Menu Search Engine

midnight.pub midnight.pub/posts/351

At the risk of branding oneself a pariah, I'm going to pose a question. While I'm a grateful user of much FOSS, I tend to approach this more from a functional perspective than a principled one. Is such a statement complete anathema to much of the crowd here?

To illustrate the point: thanks to

decades of daily work experience

That's the base of my system, and layered on top is FOSS-everything-I-can-find. For those not familiar, there's a simple and smartly designed 'package manager' called Scoop that functions like an apt-get for Windows. I've scripted out and aliased everything I can for the things I want to do on the system. I spend as much time in VS Code as I do in anything else.

For me this is very much a use-what-works approach, functional, pragmatic. It works well, it's second nature to me at this point.

But then a hardware change required 'reactivation', which didn't work and I couldn't get resolved until the next day. That's when I felt the whole arrangement hitting The Wall of Control.

pardon the interruption

however

the system is not yours

until you are compliant

The issue is resolved and I am now In Compliance And Can Be Sure I Am Running Genuine Windows. It didn't occur to me that a hardware change meant some sneaky silicon sleuths might have replaced my existing, already Genuine install with a liar! Fake! Cheat! that just so happened to look and work exactly the same as before, except for said warning. But apparently MS thinks this is a thing. Or wants you to think so.

It's a little like having a house built and then finding the plumber installed a cut-off valve that only they have access to. And if you replace a faucet in the kitchen some months later, they just might use that valve until you show them the receipt for the new faucet.

I really don't like that. At all.

This isn't for me about hating on a

software giant working for profit.

So I'm seriously considering the

split-brain procedure I must

As you mentioned liking KDE: If you have reasonable hardware ressources (and for Windows you've probably run more than necessary), I'd also recommend using KDE as a Desktop. Like any other desktop (Mate, XFCE would be my next choices) it's available for a ton of distros, so the freedom of choice is just another kind of freedom here, distrowatch.com may help you with that. And most distros could be started and run in virtual machines for a first evalutation.

My personal experience with Kubuntu was really bad (but should be re-evaluated again). So although I like debian based distros I've spend most of my 20 years of linux desktop usage on OpenSuse. To make it a grandpa tells from the great war story: I actually bought my first Suse-Linux in a box filled with a bunchfull of floppies and a book ...

I left behind the Windows world ~10 years ago. I still got a second partition with windows for gaming, but I barely use it anymore as most Steam games run on Linux.

I can only recommend Xubuntu as a starting distribution. Xfce is nice and simple and you get the full support of Ubuntu.

Yes! Join us! We have free (as in freedom) cookies!

The Linux world is no longer as good as it used to be, but if anything you won't get bad surprises, and you really have a chance at exercising real ownership on your system.

Now, everyone has their opinions on this topic, but my recommendation is to use Debian with xfce4 or mate ;-)

You hit the nail when you said "your system is your system", the only way to achieve that is using exclusively free software. Now that is a more philosophical approach, but that is what I adhere to. Many times I go out of my way to use a free software, and if such thing doesn't exist I don't use at all, but I reckon this might be too much for the majority and there are some situations in which indeed one is forced to use proprietary software, so I'm not dogmatic about this, heck I even have a proprietary firmware for my wifi.

We should strive to free everything we can, in my view many have done that with other important matters for freedom, at high personal cost, so I don't wish to squander their efforts

Currently I'm thinking about many stuff related to the free software movement, how it relates to other important fights we have to reach a more just society and etc, so expect some big text from me in the future (near?), but the main point is: freedom is for human beings, not code, it is merely an instrument.

you're on midnight.pub/posts/351